Teams

Team 2 Team Vittoria

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-14vs Team 1 CourtmastersLost 01
L#3 DoublesArvind Jairam / Ricardo Scarlatella vs Kevin Tindle / Kursat Yavuz0-6, 3-6
2024-09-08vs Team 5 MaddiWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmre Yener / Arvind Jairam vs Hung Le / Praveen Mullacherry6-4, 6-2
2024-09-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesArvind Jairam / Emre Yener vs Suchul Lee / James Kim6-2, 6-1
2024-08-24vs Team 8 Stringing WinnersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRodney Carpenter / Robin Beard vs Hieu Cao / Thuy Nguyen2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesArvind Jairam / Emre Yener vs Tom Tran Nguyen / David Luu6-0, 6-2
2024-08-14vs Team 6 Z's Last Chance SaloonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Beard / Rodney Carpenter vs Chris Ford / Scott Williams6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesArvind Jairam / Rajeev Maddipati vs Ankur Jain / John Williamson6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deniz Karaca
published 4.5
4.11
Yue She
published
3.88
Kevin Hough
published
3.84
Arvind Jairam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Rodney Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Michael Polmanteer
published
Emre Yener
published 4
Geddy Zarzuela
published 4
Khai Ngo
published
Rajeev Maddipati
published
Ricardo Scarlatella
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rodney Carpenter + Arvind Jairam4252% games+14.5% vs expected
Rodney Carpenter + Kevin Hough134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deniz Karaca
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yue She
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Kevin Hough
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Arvind Jairam
118W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Rodney Carpenter
33W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Michael Polmanteer
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Emre Yener
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Geddy Zarzuela
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Khai Ngo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rajeev Maddipati
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricardo Scarlatella
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.