Teams

Watts/NLR/BP

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Richards
published 4
3.71
Molly Murdock
published
3.68
Emily Ryan
published
3.62
Amanda Crowley
published 4
3.38
Deanna Garretson
published 3.5
3.26
Hannah Lewis
published
3.25
Muay Dillard
published
Anna Squire
published 3.5
3.06
Haylee Scott
published
3.05
Brandi Watts
published 3
2.82
Katrina Vaughn
published
2.68
Martha Wooten
published
Marisa Cahill
published
Tracy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Murdock + Hannah Lewis10163% games+19.5% vs expected
Martha Wooten + Brandi Watts8554% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abby Richards
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Murdock
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Emily Ryan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Amanda Crowley
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Hannah Lewis
23W–8L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.26
Muay Dillard
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Anna Squire
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Haylee Scott
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Brandi Watts
42W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Katrina Vaughn
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Martha Wooten
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Marisa Cahill
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Foster
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.