Teams

Milton - Pinehurst Resort

2023 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-17vs McClymont - CCNC 4.5/4.0/3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Roach / Susi Tarvis vs Christina Powers / Courtney McGuirt6-2, 6-2
2023-07-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Roach / Susi Tarvis vs Amanda Maxey / Sandra Jones6-4, 6-3
2023-07-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusi Tarvis / Julie Milton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-22vs McClymont - CCNC 4.5/4.0/3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Roach / Susi Tarvis vs Christina Powers / Katherine Melvin6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aimee Bonnell
published 4.5
4.21
Meghan Watts
published
3.86
Kailey Parziale
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.86
Allison Vetter
published 4
3.79
Abbey Downing
published 4
3.70
Annie Osterman
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.57
Susi Tarvis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Tara Platt
published
3.49
Theresa Roach
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.33
Julie Milton
published
Kathy Mason
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Platt + Annie Osterman9853% games+9.6% vs expected
Susi Tarvis + Theresa Roach23559% games+3.7% vs expected
Kailey Parziale + Annie Osterman572656% games+2.7% vs expected
Susi Tarvis + Annie Osterman7358% gamesnot enough data
Tara Platt + Theresa Roach3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aimee Bonnell
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Watts
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
4
Kailey Parziale
187W–72L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Allison Vetter
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Abbey Downing
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Annie Osterman
169W–149L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Susi Tarvis
118W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.57
Tara Platt
62W–45L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Theresa Roach
91W–82L career · 8 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Julie Milton
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
Kathy Mason
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.