Teams

Courtside Cougars

2024 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall Women · 7.0 W Monday

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-04vs Mission Valley ChristieLost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Hackney / Brenda Mike vs Jennifer Jaworski / CHIEKO OHRSTROM1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandi Gayheart / Lorraine Lynn vs Lana Anderson / Cathy Reich1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-06vs LWR Varsity GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Mike / Sue Hackney vs Nancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandi Gayheart / Christine Wilson vs Patricia Cunningham / Carol Somers7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-10-30vs University Park BarryWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Mike / Sue Hackney vs Deborah van Brunt / Karen Morgan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandi Gayheart / Christine Wilson vs Mary Barry / Dodie Shuert6-2, 6-4
2023-10-23vs Payne Park LacroixWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandi Gayheart / Sue Hackney vs Peggy Hite / Carol Hill7-6, 6-4
2023-10-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLorraine Lynn / Sandi Gayheart vs Susan Terry / Patricia Appolonia2-6, 5-7
2023-10-09vs Payne Park HallLost 01
L#3 DoublesLorraine Lynn / Sandi Gayheart vs Suzanne Gallof / Catherine Hawkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandi Gayheart / Lorraine Lynn vs Nancy Fehl / Nancy Sneed4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Brenda Mike
published 3.5
3.23
Dale Cole
published 3.5
3.10
Sue Hackney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Christine Wilson
published 3.5
Jenny Spencer
published
Lorraine Lynn
published
Nancy Smith
published
Sally Pym
published
Sandi Gayheart
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Spencer + Dale Cole224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Pym + Brenda Mike123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Mike
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Dale Cole
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Sue Hackney
81W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Christine Wilson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89
Jenny Spencer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorraine Lynn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Smith
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sally Pym
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandi Gayheart
69W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.