Teams

Payne Park Hall

2024 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall Women · 7.0 W Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-04vs Island Walk DeBoerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMona Harrington / Janet Hepner vs Patricia Gregory / Jill Sneider5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-11-27vs Courtside CougarsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Amy Chausse / Brenda Mike2-6, 2-6
2023-11-13vs Payne Park LacroixLost 01
L#2 DoublesMona Harrington / Marianne Zentz vs Nancy LeFevre / Joanne Wuelfing7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-11-06vs Mission Valley ChristieLost 01
L#1 DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Jennifer Jaworski / CHIEKO OHRSTROM6-7, 4-6
2023-10-02vs University Park BarryWon 10
W#1 DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Karen Morgan / Ursula Ruckli6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Beverly Austgen
published 3.5
3.23
Marianne Zentz
published
3.16
Catherine Hawkins
published 3.5
Janet Hepner
published
Jean Floyd
published
Jill Bressler
published
JoMarie Privitera
published
Linda Kretlow
published
Mona Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sigi Moriece
published
Taffy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kretlow + Mona Harrington181453% gamesnot enough data
Janet Hepner + Linda Kretlow7644% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Austgen + Catherine Hawkins1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beverly Austgen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Marianne Zentz
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Hawkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Janet Hepner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jean Floyd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Bressler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
JoMarie Privitera
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Kretlow
38W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mona Harrington
128W–145L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sigi Moriece
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taffy Anderson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.