Teams

CV-Toscana/Mulflur & Kinney

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Cynthia Mulflur vs Wanda Ramos / Deborah Lands5-7, 0-6
2022-03-08vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesKate Bontje / Cynthia Mulflur vs Dianne Dalton / Claire Griffin1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCheryl Burke / Rebecca Bratlien vs Melanie Ditton / Tiffany Baker0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Allison Alanis vs Lanette Hansen / Janice Savidge7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-14vs CV-Embassy Tennis Club/SashaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Kate Bontje vs Karen Gallagher / Rhonda Manning3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Mulflur / Allison Alanis vs Sue Velarde / Kathy McArthur6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Cynthia Mulflur vs Gina Orban / Sanae Chance3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCynthia Mulflur / Rebecca Bratlien vs Faith Zelenko / Brenda Ouimet4-6, 3-6
2022-01-17vs CV-Palm Valley/Peller & M WoodwardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Mulflur / Cheryl Burke vs Maureen Woodward / Debra Creem1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLillian Kinney / Rebecca Bratlien vs Barbara Vogel / Carole Clark6-2, 6-4
2022-01-10vs CV-Sun City PD/GrovesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Burke / Rebecca Bratlien vs Mona Klimmek / Terri Johnson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Peterson / Cynthia Mulflur vs Patricia Taylor / Michele Mcgee1-6, 2-6
2022-01-03vs CV-Mission Hills CC/MoskowitzLost 02
L#2 DoublesCynthia Mulflur / Cheryl Burke vs Marta Mykytyn-Hill / Barbara Davis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Judy van Handel vs Cheryle Daley / Arlene Grodnick5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Cynthia Mulflur
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Kate Bontje
published
Taunja Feldman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Mulflur + Rebecca Bratlien1537% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 9 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Cynthia Mulflur
14W–39L career · type S · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Bontje
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taunja Feldman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.