Teams

MD.Ligay

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-09vs TOHS.FinnSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Heather Ingram6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrooke Rawls vs Kristen Henderson6-3, 6-3
2022-07-27vs TOC.GuerraWon 20
W#1 SinglesCait Bauer vs Jessica Revels6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrooke Rawls vs Jessenia Delos Santos6-3, 6-2
2022-06-28vs PW.StegmanLost 01
L#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Renee Stegman0-6, 6-7
2022-06-22vs TOC.EvansLost 01
L#2 SinglesCait Bauer vs Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales2-6, 4-6
2022-06-16vs MD.OldhamWon 10
W#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Stefanie Logue6-2, 6-4
2022-06-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Bearta Alchacar6-2, 6-0
2022-06-01vs PW.KraftWon 30
W#1 SinglesCait Bauer vs Micha Federico6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Penny Kraft6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBrooke Rawls vs Siping Roussin6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Mollie McCauley
published
3.58
Allie Ligay
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.51
Cait Bauer
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.46
Katherine Henry
published
3.10
Brooke Rawls
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Shari McCandlish
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Drew Long
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Rawls + Shari McCandlish314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Cait Bauer314 matchesnot enough data
Allie Ligay + Katherine Henry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie McCauley
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.69
3.5
Allie Ligay
203W–66L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Cait Bauer
88W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Katherine Henry
21W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Brooke Rawls
196W–121L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Shari McCandlish
82W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Drew Long
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.