Teams

MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan

2026 ECT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women Flt 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-06vs NHH: Fireballs: GershfeldLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Steverman / Eileen Cosgriff vs Susan Griffiths / Marie Crane4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesZhi Gao vs Sheila Cimmino1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMildred Goebel / Lisa Marie Coleman vs Jeanne Stracener / Svetlana Gershfeld3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Baumann / Monica Collins vs Lillian Garcia / Lancia Blatchley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs MD: MadRakets:BilskisLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Cosgriff / Dana Johnson vs Juliette Fumex / Krista Fay7-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesAmy Amaro / Mildred Goebel vs Patricia Goldfeder / Andrea Fleischman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Baumann / Zhi Gao vs Kristin Gladney / Eileen Wildermann5-7, 3-6
2026-05-09vs GF: Namaste at the Net: RosecransLost 03
L#1 DoublesMia Nolan / Kathy Calnen vs Eleanor Tandler / Jill Fried1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZhi Gao vs Holly Wheeler2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Eileen Cosgriff vs Debbie Kelly / Kathy Tsatsanis6-7, 5-7
2026-04-25vs LS: DeMatteo's Divas: DeMatteoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Eileen Cosgriff vs Lisa Belliveau / Cathy Landers0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesZhi Gao vs Elaine Shapiro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Zupkus / Heather Rowley vs Roisin MacKey / Anne Luner5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLauri Burke / Mildred Goebel vs Kim de Matteo / Patricia Conway6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-22vs OSB: Diamond Dogs II: LibertLost 13
L#1 DoublesEileen Cosgriff / Mia Nolan vs Carolyn Katz / MaryBeth Giles2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Amy Searle6-3, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMildred Goebel / Janet Zupkus vs Eileen Duggan / Heather Bancroft-Hunt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Amaro / Diann Cote vs Ellen Gallinatti / Cathleen Carroll3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesHeather Rowley / Kathy Calnen vs Liesl Purviance / Supreeti Saikia1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesZhi Gao vs Onelda Koehler0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEileen Cosgriff / Mildred Goebel vs Kristen Scully / Sara Singer6-3, 6-2
2026-03-07vs OSB: Prosecco girls: Goletz/PotterSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Eileen Cosgriff vs Svetlana Goletz / Cherie Anderson-Mucha6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Yu Nong Khew6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMia Nolan / Mildred Goebel vs Beverly Costello / Nancy Schumann3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Marvel / Amy Amaro vs Nancy Eastwood / Megan Collins2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MD: MadRakets:Bilskis0720616206
2NHH: Fireballs: Gershfeld07161024218
3OSB: Diamond Dogs II: Libert0714926237
4TCT: 3.5 Racquettes Spring 40: Buschauer07151330238
5GF: Namaste at the Net: Rosecrans07131433251
6LS: DeMatteo's Divas: DeMatteo07121634258
7MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan0781841276
8OSB: Prosecco girls: Goletz/Potter0782043277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dana Johnson
published 3.5
Heather Rowley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Steverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Ding Ding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Eileen Cosgriff
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Kathy Calnen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Mia Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Amy Amaro
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Monica Collins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.91
Zhi Gao
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Mildred Goebel
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Amy Baumann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Denise Marvel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Lauri Burke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Diann Cote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Zupkus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Baumann + Eileen Cosgriff9259% games+6.3% vs expected
Lauri Burke + Eileen Cosgriff8456% games+5.3% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Sarah Steverman4161% games+3.3% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Eileen Cosgriff1640% games+1.9% vs expected
Eileen Cosgriff + Kathy Calnen5645% games+0.9% vs expected
Amy Amaro + Mildred Goebel2452% games+0.7% vs expected
Lauri Burke + Kathy Calnen2344% games−0.5% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Diann Cote2635% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Johnson
52W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Heather Rowley
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Steverman
30W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ding Ding
27W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Eileen Cosgriff
41W–52L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kathy Calnen
18W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Mia Nolan
25W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Amy Amaro
28W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Monica Collins
20W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.96
Zhi Gao
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91
Mildred Goebel
21W–26L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Amy Baumann
93W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Denise Marvel
3W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Lauri Burke
85W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Diann Cote
3W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
Janet Zupkus
44W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.