Teams

BRAMHALL PK 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.85 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesVolkan Oktem / Valerie Huang vs Julia Barsov / Ben Chen6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Hemant Chaudhary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Xuezhen Fan
published
3.89
Esther Chen
published 4
3.82
Arianna Choing
published 4
Andy Cheng
published 4
3.72
Jonathan Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Chase Matecun
published 4
3.66
Iris Xin
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 4
3.61
Matthew Liem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Devank Agarwal
published 3.5
3.50
Taryn Yee
published
3.40
Baozhang Ren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Shi Dong
published
3.30
Kan Yu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Kenny Law
published
Ellen Xiao
published 3.5
3.17
Charlotte He
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Matthew Derby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
KAREN HOANG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Valerie Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Volkan Oktem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hemant Chaudhary
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Xuezhen Fan
14W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Esther Chen
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Arianna Choing
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Andy Cheng
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Wong
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Chase Matecun
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Iris Xin
99W–36L career · 17 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Matthew Liem
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Devank Agarwal
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Taryn Yee
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Baozhang Ren
18W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Shi Dong
36W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kan Yu
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Kenny Law
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ellen Xiao
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Charlotte He
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Matthew Derby
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
KAREN HOANG
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Valerie Huang
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Volkan Oktem
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.