Teams

LATA40/Simpson/CTFC

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 4.0 - Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Dale Roberts
published 4
3.89
Caty Garside
published 4
3.79
Jana Xanthakos
published
3.77
Zivia Kocher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Stephanie Cordum
published
3.65
Kathleen Lenti
published
3.64
Tami Malatek
published
3.62
Lisa Echols
published
3.62
Eugenia Hardwick
published
3.58
Kathy Foster
published
3.52
Robin Simpson
published
3.50
Kim Ziegler
published
3.48
Sherri Greenberg
published
3.44
Libby Tompkins
published
3.41
Debbie Holland
published 3.5
3.39
Trish DuBose
published
3.29
Karen Thompson
published
3.21
Amy Beall
published 4
Donna Bull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caty Garside + Jana Xanthakos5075% games+16.6% vs expected
Zivia Kocher + Dale Roberts5362% games+11.0% vs expected
Tami Malatek + Robin Simpson4455% games+8.3% vs expected
Tami Malatek + Lisa Echols6451% games+6.3% vs expected
Kathy Foster + Karen Thompson4357% games+4.9% vs expected
Dale Roberts + Jana Xanthakos12558% games+4.3% vs expected
Donna Bull + Eugenia Hardwick4163% games+3.9% vs expected
Stephanie Cordum + Kathleen Lenti231654% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Roberts
41W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Caty Garside
85W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Jana Xanthakos
42W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Zivia Kocher
38W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Stephanie Cordum
45W–29L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kathleen Lenti
45W–35L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Tami Malatek
45W–38L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Lisa Echols
61W–40L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Eugenia Hardwick
52W–59L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Kathy Foster
68W–50L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Robin Simpson
71W–44L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Kim Ziegler
37W–41L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sherri Greenberg
22W–24L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Libby Tompkins
16W–34L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Holland
26W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Trish DuBose
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Karen Thompson
78W–63L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
4
Amy Beall
63W–37L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Donna Bull
34W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.