Teams

Bunnett/18/M/3-3.5-4/QTC

2024 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Harry Johnson
published 4
4.06
Suren Visvanathan
published
4.03
Surinder Tank
published
3.77
Franklin Roemer
published 4
Adam Driskill
published 4
3.75
Richard Karam
published
3.69
Slattery Johnson
published
3.66
Mike Fiser
published
3.49
Blake Bunnett
published 3.5
3.38
Aaron Burton
published 3.5
3.37
Tim Stuart
published
3.18
Andre Joshua Mira
published 3.5
3.06
Rahul Shah
published
3.03
Nak Choi
published
Kyle Hill
published
Mike Vu
published
Spencer Hurst
published
Sujith Palleti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Slattery Johnson + Mike Fiser4267% games+17.6% vs expected
Surinder Tank + Slattery Johnson5364% games+11.9% vs expected
Tim Stuart + Blake Bunnett5161% games+7.3% vs expected
Slattery Johnson + Blake Bunnett4348% games−4.3% vs expected
Harry Johnson + Slattery Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harry Johnson
42W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
4.07
Suren Visvanathan
22W–7L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.06
Surinder Tank
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Franklin Roemer
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Adam Driskill
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Karam
45W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Slattery Johnson
78W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.69
Mike Fiser
21W–22L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Blake Bunnett
52W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Aaron Burton
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.38
Tim Stuart
57W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Andre Joshua Mira
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Rahul Shah
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
Nak Choi
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Kyle Hill
22W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Vu
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spencer Hurst
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sujith Palleti
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.