Teams

STIRLING CLUB

2022 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.69 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-08vs CANYON GATEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Emily Lindsey vs Catherine Perez / Catherine Sullivan2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Anjanette Bixel6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Stephen / Cerisse Ward vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-01vs CLUB RIDGESWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Lindsey / Lori Smith vs Kellye Ray / Jamie Sabet6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Courtney Long3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Lubi Georgieva vs Golssa Moridi / Maryam Kaveh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-25vs SPANISH TRAILLost 02
L#1 DoublesMina McCormick / Guadalupe Sherman vs Tina Nathalia / Stacy Sheeley Reyes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Stephen / Debra Kelleher vs Alexandria Chang / Nancy Ozun4-6, 3-6
2022-05-18vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Cerisse Ward vs Kara Gaston / Stephanie Mitchell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Veazey / Stephanie Stephen vs Talia Galvez / Valentina Herzog0-6, 1-6
2022-05-11vs DTC #3Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Mina McCormick vs Kathleen Chamberlain / Karen Wooldridge5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Kelly Nguyen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Cerisse Ward vs Roslyn Katz / Julie Knox4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-04vs DTC #1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Stephanie Stephen vs Yuanhong Du / Lauren Pena2-6, 1-6
2022-04-27vs RED ROCK CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Lori Smith vs Brigitte Fallon - (DQ)* / Christine Vacin2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesArlene Joyner-Tucker / Emily Lindsey vs Heather Gamez / Julie Brown3-6, 3-6
2022-04-20vs TPCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Cerisse Ward vs Sandra Thompson / Trish Metriyakool1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Susun Michaels6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Stephen / Guadalupe Sherman vs Chelsey Queeley / Katrina Braman6-4, 6-2
2022-04-06vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Mina McCormick vs Margaret Bruno / Arlene Lytle6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Lindsey vs Christie Sanders6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Arlene Joyner-Tucker vs Ashley Richas / Amanda Irving6-4, 7-6
2022-03-30vs NV/PRASAD/ADULT 18 & OVER W2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Veazey / Cerisse Ward vs Joan Chinn / Erin Jolly0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGuadalupe Sherman vs Shannon Cole6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Stephen / Arlene Joyner-Tucker vs Lisa Dickstein / Maria Zoine1-6, 0-6
2022-03-23vs DTC #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Cerisse Ward vs Lani Wong / Julie Ylarde6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Stephanie Stephen vs Barb Stanley / Christa Shiklanian3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Karen Veazey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.35
Debra Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Cerisse Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lubi Georgieva
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.76
Arlene Joyner-Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.63
Stephanie Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Stephen + Debra Kelleher1539% games+4.3% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Debra Kelleher71445% games+2.1% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Debra Kelleher4742% games−1.4% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Stephanie Stephen1536% games−3.2% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Lubi Georgieva61342% games−3.9% vs expected
Lubi Georgieva + Debra Kelleher11632% games−4.5% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Guadalupe Sherman3746% games−5.8% vs expected
Cerisse Ward + Debra Kelleher2538% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Lindsey
27W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Karen Veazey
111W–148L career · 8 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Debra Kelleher
87W–146L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Cerisse Ward
6W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
51W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Lubi Georgieva
37W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Arlene Joyner-Tucker
19W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.76
2.5
Stephanie Stephen
15W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.