Teams

Wisehaven - Michels

2026 USTA 40 & Over League · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.73 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-18vs Hempfield - CovellLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Janet Krusen vs Nancy Opilo / Patricia Lawrence2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly Sandhu vs Michele Mccartney3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLouise Manzella / Anna Lamond vs Debora Covell / Karen Schaufert0-6, 0-6
2026-08-11vs Messiah University - TrappLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Marianne Michels vs Audrey Lubas / Sarah Gates Adams7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Jane Acquilano6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Alison Flores vs Melise Rowan / Melissa Ruggiero1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Crowley / Robin Treider vs Carolyn Hopwood / Susan Kurtz4-6, 0-6
2026-08-04vs Hempfield - ArtersLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Mary McClelland vs Heather Arters / Becky Katz5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Meredith Clark7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Laura Barwick vs Tia Tedder / Marcy Blitz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Robertson / Sheryl Stoll vs Madhavi Reddy / Catherine Ingram2-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs Messiah University - TrappLost 04
L#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Marianne Michels vs Jane Acquilano / Sarah Gates Adams6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Melise Rowan6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Mary McClelland vs Natalie Grubb / Cindee Trapp5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Treider / Anna Lamond vs Melissa Ruggiero / Sowmya Surapaneni1-6, 2-6
2026-07-20vs Hempfield - HufnagelWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Lanza / Kimberly Sandhu vs Bonnie Westheaffer / Catherine Hill6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEmma Melhorn vs Kristine Johnston7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Flores / Mary McClelland vs Madonna Hufnagel / Linda Scott6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLouise Manzella / Anna Lamond vs Tina Loose / Beth Apetrior0-6, 2-6
2026-07-14vs Hershey - CorcoranWon 31
W#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Alison Flores vs Debbie Bray / Michele Harnden3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Amanda Rutt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Laura Barwick vs Katherine Aitken / Alison Feeney6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary McClelland / Sheryl Stoll vs Gretchen Yarnall / Ellen Stoute3-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Lanza / Kimberly Sandhu vs Becky Katz / Michelle Keener2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Melhorn vs Heather Arters7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Barwick / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Teresa Clark / Tiffany Marino6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnna Lamond / Jennifer Small vs Catherine Ingram / Anne Garber3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-11vs Hershey - CorcoranLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura Lanza / Kimberly Sandhu vs Nicole Nikolaus / Alyssa DeBlasio6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmma Melhorn vs Amanda Rutt2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarianne Michels / Alison Flores vs Katherine Aitken / Sue Shema7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Janet Krusen vs Ellen Stoute / Kristin Jeffries2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-26vs Hempfield - CovellSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarianne Michels / Laura Lanza vs LeeAnn Palmer / Karen Schaufert3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmma Melhorn vs Michele Mccartney6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Kimberly Sandhu vs Nancy Opilo / Lori Tully6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Barwick / Mary McClelland vs Patricia Lawrence / Casey Davis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-12vs Hempfield - HufnagelSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Marianne Michels vs Madonna Hufnagel / Jennifer Rakoczy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Melissa Houston6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Robertson / Mary McClelland vs Abby Aukamp / Kelly Kurtz2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Barwick / Robin Treider vs Bonnie Fissella / Kathy Mowrer3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.86
Kimberly Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.85
Laura Lanza
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.75
Emma Melhorn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.73
Mary McClelland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Marianne Michels
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Laura Barwick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Alison Flores
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Janet Krusen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Sheryl Stoll
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Cynthia Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.29
Robin Treider
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.14
Louise Manzella
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Anna Lamond
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Karen Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Treider + Kimberly Sandhu7261% games+13.0% vs expected
Louise Manzella + Sheryl Stoll2940% games+7.2% vs expected
Anna Lamond + Janet Krusen5650% games+4.0% vs expected
Louise Manzella + Laura Lanza6749% games+3.2% vs expected
Anna Lamond + Kimberly Sandhu443654% games+1.5% vs expected
Laura Lanza + Kimberly Sandhu9358% games+0.7% vs expected
Laura Lanza + Marianne Michels171750% games−2.2% vs expected
Robin Treider + Cynthia Crowley5650% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Preisendorfer
145W–136L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Kimberly Sandhu
274W–138L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Laura Lanza
228W–167L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
Emma Melhorn
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Mary McClelland
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Marianne Michels
173W–213L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Laura Barwick
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Alison Flores
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Janet Krusen
157W–103L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Sheryl Stoll
74W–104L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Cynthia Crowley
138W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Robin Treider
136W–146L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Louise Manzella
65W–107L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Anna Lamond
186W–212L career · 8 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Karen Robertson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.