Teams

BC - MCC/ChristineBucklin

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-12-04vs BC - AltaVista/RihoNakanoWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Brown / Kari Carpino vs Miki Heinonen / Nancy Maeda0-4
2022-11-20vs BC - ErnieHowlett/MaryRoseKalemLost 02
L#2 DoublesKari Carpino / Kimberly Marasco vs Hong Zhang / Aki Takeda0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Bucklin / Laura Akeley vs Jocelyn Maye / Mika Kaiser0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-13vs BC - MCC/RachelAlexanderLost 01
L#1 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Renee Tinker vs Haruko Froeb / Linda Lai4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-11-06vs BC - Kramer/SophieSokolowWon 10
W#3 DoublesMimi Fischer / Renee Tinker vs Tanya Drawer / Sarah Robarts6-4, 7-6
2022-10-30vs BC - WestEnd/DianeKaiserWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Pavone / Mariel VandenHengel vs Tami Reyes / Jennie Speciale3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-23vs BC - WestEnd/CherylUnreinLost 02
L#1 DoublesMariel VandenHengel / Christa Givich vs Kimberly Jones / Elaine Dodson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Akeley / Kari Carpino vs Susan Neal / Jackie Tagliaferro2-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs BC - MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 01
L#3 DoublesMimi Fischer / Jill Wong vs Julie Watts / Nicole Brown7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKari Carpino / Kimberly Marasco vs Concetta Brown / Katherine Nook6-7, 2-6
2022-10-02vs BC - AltaVista/RihoNakanoWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Pavone / Mariel VandenHengel vs Carol Ecker / H Kim Duong5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Akeley / Kari Carpino vs Rebecca Chavira / Kim Graham0-6, 2-6
2022-09-18vs BC - ErnieHowlett/MaryRoseKalemLost 01
L#3 DoublesKari Carpino / Nancy Reynolds vs Tracy Costantino / Lisa Inomata-O'Connell4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Renee Tinker
published
3.72
Mariel VandenHengel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Alison Bogert
published 3.5
3.28
Kari Carpino
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Kimberly Graham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Christine Bucklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jill Wong
published
Mary Stiles
published
Mimi Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Mariel VandenHengel
31W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Alison Bogert
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Kari Carpino
41W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Kimberly Graham
38W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Christine Bucklin
26W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jill Wong
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Stiles
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mimi Fischer
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.