Teams

BC - Kramer/SophieSokolow

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-27vs BC - AltaVista/RihoNakanoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKara Salmonson / Tanya Drawer vs Jennifer Mann / Sue Bingham6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAkiko Cohen / May Feuer vs Reiko Sasagawa / Miki Heinonen1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Drawer / Gail Starinieri vs Teresa Campbell / Michelle Alford2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-13vs BC - ErnieHowlett/MaryRoseKalemLost 01
L#3 DoublesAkiko Cohen / May Feuer vs Rita Benson / Tracy Costantino4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-12vs BC - MCC/RachelAlexanderWon 10
W#3 DoublesKara Salmonson / Tanya Drawer vs Mojgan Vakili / Jen Hall6-2, 6-4
2022-11-06vs BC - MCC/ChristineBucklinLost 01
L#3 DoublesTanya Drawer / Sarah Robarts vs Mimi Fischer / Renee Tinker4-6, 6-7
2022-10-30vs BC - MCC/RachelAlexanderLost 01
L#3 DoublesTanya Drawer / Akiko Cohen vs Kelly Samimi / Shawn Dugan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-09vs BC - MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesTanya Drawer / May Feuer vs Kelli Spriggs / Teresa Eichner3-6, 1-6
2022-10-02vs BC - PVTC/LenaMiller-HoriLost 01
L#3 DoublesAkiko Cohen / Tanya Drawer vs Shubha Chick / Michelle Rosen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Melanie Archer
published
3.99
3.65
Carla Ramirez
published 4
3.55
Tanya Drawer
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Kara Salmonson
published
3.31
Gail Starinieri
published 3.5
3.28
Akiko Cohen
published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robarts
published
May Feuer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sherry Davidowitz
published
Stephanie Padula
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

May Feuer + Tanya Drawer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Archer
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Michelle Tangeman
47W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Carla Ramirez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Tanya Drawer
106W–90L career · 12 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kara Salmonson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Gail Starinieri
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Akiko Cohen
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Sarah Robarts
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
May Feuer
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherry Davidowitz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Padula
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.