Teams

MSIL 5.5W Winter Combo Chelikas-Pekin

2026 MSIL Winter Combo -MSIL West League · West MSIL 5.5W Combo

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-17Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Turner / Judith Triggs vs Colleen Elser / Theresa Poon6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatie Franzen / Jennie Hahn vs Mary Bullock / Meghan Genzel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Chelikas / Judith Triggs vs Ellen Vosberg / Colleen Elser6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Ellis / Jennie Hahn vs Kim Spirling / Theresa Poon1-6, 3-6
2026-04-12Won 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Franzen / Jennie Hahn vs Jane Gumm / Deborah Fazio-Carroll3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Triggs / Laura Turner vs Colleen Elser / Meghan Genzel6-3, 6-3
2026-03-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoann Blair / Jennie Hahn vs Martha Siwicke / Jane Gumm6-4, 6-0
2026-03-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJudith Triggs / Anna Dahlin vs Ellen Vosberg / Jane Gumm1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · West MSIL 5.5W Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 5.5W Winter Combo Chelikas-Pekin5114411106
2MSIL 5.5W Winter Combo Vosberg-Peoria1541431199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Alex Lamprecht
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.80
Sue Chelikas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Joann Blair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.59
Angelia Neeley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.57
Kara Knepp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Judith Triggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Cheryl Ellis
published 2.5
2.17
Jennie Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Chelikas + Joann Blair4847% games+1.2% vs expected
Judith Triggs + Jennie Hahn3341% gamesnot enough data
Kara Knepp + Alex Lamprecht404 matchesnot enough data
Joann Blair + Judith Triggs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alex Lamprecht
51W–53L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Sue Chelikas
68W–138L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Joann Blair
56W–101L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Angelia Neeley
21W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Kara Knepp
55W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Judith Triggs
18W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Cheryl Ellis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennie Hahn
7W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.