Teams

CDTA S(W) TriWLow 7MT Pal Byrne Mon 7 $26

CDTA 1Summer Tri Level (WN · WE)

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesSharon Snyder / Meg LaMonica vs Emily Lund / Tina Werber0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Lewis / Stacey Watson vs Christie Jordan / Margaux Teegarden-Downs2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Cathi Cappas vs Nedra Harris / Robin Ford4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Snyder / Cherrie Han vs Pamela Sherman / Elham Abboud3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Sheri Levine vs Alexandra Anlas / Abby Ross2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Deirdre Sebastian / Anne Rockwell6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Stacey Watson vs Vicki Groo / Jane Peller6-3, 5-3
W#2 DoublesCathi Cappas / Meg LaMonica vs Christine Pizza / Lisa Modrich7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Lange / Jacqueline Lakely vs Alyssa Heizer / Elaine Pieropan1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S(W) TriWLow 5Glenview Baltazar Tue 7 $21511537106
2CDTA S(W) TriWLow 6Northbrook Lund Tue 7 $264212614133
3CDTA S(W) TriWLow 2Berens OUT Anderson Thur 6:30 $223310818146
4CDTA S(W) TriWLow 3Lake Bluff Pacaut Thur 6:30 $223381023161
5CDTA S(W) TriWLow 7MT Pal Byrne Mon 7 $263371123169
6CDTA S(W) TriWLow 1River Trails Fuller Sat 2 $262471124164
7CDTA S(W) TriWLow 4Barrington Martinez Wed 7 $241541431202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kelly Couris
published 4
Amy Byrne
published 4
3.31
Jane Moon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Sheri Levine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Meg LaMonica
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Sharon Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Cathi Cappas
published 3.5
3.07
Stacey Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
3.03
Anne Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Catherine Lange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Cherrie Han
published 3
Elizabeth Jimenez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Lakely + Sharon Snyder181454% games+12.0% vs expected
Sharon Snyder + Anne Lewis5153% games+8.6% vs expected
Cathi Cappas + Sharon Snyder3446% games+8.4% vs expected
Stacey Watson + Anne Lewis4749% games+2.4% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Jacqueline Lakely5646% games+1.3% vs expected
Cathi Cappas + Meg LaMonica111153% games+1.0% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Anne Lewis13361% games+0.9% vs expected
Cathi Cappas + Stacey Watson9658% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Couris
90W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Amy Byrne
55W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Moon
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Sheri Levine
64W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Meg LaMonica
89W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Sharon Snyder
94W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Cathi Cappas
115W–93L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Stacey Watson
50W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anne Lewis
60W–80L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Catherine Lange
71W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Elizabeth Jimenez
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.