Teams

CDTA S(W) TriWLow 5Glenview Baltazar Tue 7 $21

CDTA 1Summer Tri Level (WN · WE)

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesTracy Meyer / Sarah Terry vs Carolyn Humpherson / Meg Griffin6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Diana Atad vs Cindy Mulligan / Nanette Dickinson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Lund / Tina Werber vs Sharon Snyder / Meg LaMonica6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTina Werber / Tracy Meyer vs Nancy Nora / Pamela Sherman6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeanne Tromp / Michelle Yeh vs Julie Bell / Jenna Stanley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Haas / Emily Lund vs Sarah Jamieson / Abby Ross6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S(W) TriWLow 5Glenview Baltazar Tue 7 $21511537106
2CDTA S(W) TriWLow 6Northbrook Lund Tue 7 $264212614133
3CDTA S(W) TriWLow 2Berens OUT Anderson Thur 6:30 $223310818146
4CDTA S(W) TriWLow 3Lake Bluff Pacaut Thur 6:30 $223381023161
5CDTA S(W) TriWLow 7MT Pal Byrne Mon 7 $263371123169
6CDTA S(W) TriWLow 1River Trails Fuller Sat 2 $262471124164
7CDTA S(W) TriWLow 4Barrington Martinez Wed 7 $241541431202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jean Soh
published 4
3.75
Illana Hodges
published 4
3.71
Tina Werber
published 3.5
3.58
Tracy Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Annalisa Tsai
published 4
3.47
3.44
Emily Lund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
published 3.5
3.36
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.86
Diana Atad
published 3
Sarah Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Boskovic + Emily Lund6264% games+16.2% vs expected
Jean Soh + Marjorie Baltazar10364% games+8.4% vs expected
Tracy Meyer + Tina Werber231356% games+8.3% vs expected
Diana Atad + Jeanne Tromp5356% games+3.9% vs expected
Tina Werber + Emily Lund3257% games+2.2% vs expected
Margaux Teegarden-Downs + Jeanne Tromp9257% games−7.1% vs expected
Jean Soh + Illana Hodges4448% games−8.6% vs expected
Tracy Meyer + Jeanne Tromp6161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jean Soh
455W–271L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Illana Hodges
164W–79L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Tina Werber
131W–65L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Tracy Meyer
76W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Annalisa Tsai
122W–81L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Marjorie Baltazar
180W–84L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Emily Lund
241W–111L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Margaux Teegarden-Downs
58W–36L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Diana Atad
105W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sarah Terry
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.