Teams

Sarasota - Longwood/Seider

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL · 8.0 W Monday

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Christina Price vs Andrea Deitch / Angela Heck6-2, 6-2
2021-11-09vs Payne Park CaudleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Coates / Elita Krums-Kane vs Mercy Ford / Margaret Fratus6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeanna Allard / Constance Duncan vs Jean Caudle / Maria Dull6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-08Won 20
W#2 DoublesLee Bailey / Deanna Allard vs Barbara Cogen / Katie Emmons6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Peters / Dorene Seider vs Geneil Roberts / Diana Stadelnikas6-4, 6-4
2021-11-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDorene Seider / Laura Peters vs Elizabeth Scheible / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-10-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDorene Seider / Donna Hannigan vs Sharyn Quiros / Hattie Grimsley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-10-04vs LBK Club LidskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvonne Ghilardi / Constance Duncan vs Elizabeth Scheible / Lisa Tyson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-09-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Constance Duncan vs Claudia Schwab / Bernadette Waterman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-09-20vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Coates / Donna Hannigan vs Arden Allen / Sandy Schonhoff6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
3.79
Constance Duncan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Michelle Coates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Donna Hannigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Deanna Allard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Dorene Seider
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lee Bailey
published
Lynn Inganamort
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Allard + Constance Duncan291757% games+0.2% vs expected
Donna Hannigan + Dorene Seider91945% games−6.5% vs expected
Donna Hannigan + Michelle Coates7848% gamesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Deanna Allard6453% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hannigan + Constance Duncan033 matchesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Constance Duncan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bacher Brown
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Constance Duncan
148W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Michelle Coates
52W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Donna Hannigan
147W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Deanna Allard
122W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Dorene Seider
109W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lee Bailey
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.