Teams

LBK Public Schonhoff

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL · 8.0 W Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Karen Kurgan vs Jean Caudle / Teresa Noa6-2, 6-4
2021-11-03vs LBK Club LidskyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMolly Gleason / Helen Turner vs Amy Lidsky / Linda Gillott3-6, 4-6
2021-11-01vs LWR ZeiglerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Peggy Lavallee vs Diana Stadelnikas / Geneil Roberts1-6, 4-6
2021-10-18vs LWR SosaLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelen Turner / Molly Gleason vs Lu Circelli / Sheila Sosa7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2021-10-04vs LWR ZeiglerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Helen Turner vs Marina Cameron / Barbara Cogen4-6, 1-6
2021-09-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Helen Turner vs Caryl Lenahan / Susan Stayart6-2, 6-2
2021-09-20vs Sarasota - Longwood/SeiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesArden Allen / Sandy Schonhoff vs Michelle Coates / Donna Hannigan1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Gleason / Helen Turner vs Megan Gallagher / Yvonne Ghilardi2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.32
Helen Turner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Eileen Felicelli
published 3.5
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
3.02
Ann Kelmenson
published 3.5
Holly Parker
published
Karen Jennings
published
Karen Kurgan
published
Margaret Stanton
published
Peggy Lavallee
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Schonhoff + Helen Turner2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Helen Turner
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Eileen Felicelli
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Kelmenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Holly Parker
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Kurgan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Lavallee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.