← Search

Peggy Lavallee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westmount, QC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 10W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history27 matches
W
2026-03-13 · LBK Public Aitken · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Kurgan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Adams
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Stanton
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-16 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Adams
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-14 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Kurgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-03-07 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Kurgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-02-28 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kelmenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-31 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Kelmenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-03 · LBK Public Aitken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Jessop
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2023-11-29 · LBK Public Gleason Perfect Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Gleason
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-08 · LBK Public Gleason Perfect Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Gleason
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2023-10-25 · LBK Public Gleason Perfect Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Adams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 59% of the time
#2 Doubles
59%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer