Teams

LWR Zeigler

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL · 8.0 W Monday

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-08vs Sarasota - Longwood/SeiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeneil Roberts / Diana Stadelnikas vs Laura Peters / Dorene Seider4-6, 4-6
2021-11-01vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Geneil Roberts vs Sandy Schonhoff / Peggy Lavallee6-1, 6-4
2021-10-27vs River Strand QuirosWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas vs Lorraine Breidenstein / Nancy Finman6-4, 7-5
2021-10-18vs LBK Club LidskyLost 02
L#2 DoublesBetty Jo Zeigler / Geneil Roberts vs Elizabeth Scheible / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Rain / Barbara Moore vs Amy Lidsky / Linda Gillott6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-11vs LWR SosaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Nicholson / Diana Stadelnikas vs Claudia Schwab / Bernadette Waterman6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-04vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Sheila Perry vs Eileen Felicelli / Holly Parker6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Moore / Kathy Rain vs Arden Allen / Karen Jennings6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Sheila Perry
published
3.71
Karen Nicholson
published
3.71
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Betty Jo Zeigler
published 4
3.61
Barbara Cogen
published 4
3.50
Geneil Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Marcia Frost
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Stadelnikas + Geneil Roberts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Betty Jo Zeigler
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Geneil Roberts
19W–30L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.