Teams

River Strand Quiros

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL · 8.0 W Monday

9 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-22vs LWR ZeiglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Karen Nicholson / Sheila Perry5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Barbara Moore / Marcia Frost6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Judi Wilson vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Marina Cameron7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-11-15vs LBK Club LidskyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Kristi Matula / Margaret West6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Linda Gillott / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Bernadette King vs Dana Lamont / Cynthe Roberson7-6, 6-4
2021-11-08vs LBK Public SchonhoffLost 12
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Hattie Grimsley vs Mary Jane Waite / Ute Vela-Marquez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Judi Wilson vs Lilia Johnson / Peggy Lavallee6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBernadette King / Sharyn Quiros vs Margaret Stanton / Ann Kelmenson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-27vs LWR ZeiglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Judi Wilson vs Sheila Perry / Karen Nicholson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKara Beene / Hattie Grimsley vs Barbara Cogen / Katie Emmons6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Nancy Finman vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas4-6, 5-7
2021-10-18vs Payne Park CaudleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Sharyn Quiros vs Caryl Lenahan / Susan Stayart6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Judi Wilson vs Mercy Ford / Margaret Fratus6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Christie Stephenson vs Jean Caudle / Susan Falkenstrom4-6, 2-6
2021-10-11vs Sarasota - Longwood/SeiderLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Hattie Grimsley vs Dorene Seider / Donna Hannigan4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeri Barnard / Kara Beene vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Lee Bailey6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Judi Wilson vs Megan Gallagher / Yvonne Ghilardi1-6, 0-6
2021-09-27vs LBK Club LidskyWon 21
W#1 DoublesTeri Barnard / Kara Beene vs Jackie Dedrick / Lisa Tyson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Judi Wilson vs Elizabeth Scheible / Gigi Silverberg6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Christie Stephenson vs Linda Gillott / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer2-6, 0-6
2021-09-20vs LWR SosaWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeri Barnard / Sharyn Quiros vs Donna Dubinsky / Angela Heck6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Nancy Finman vs Claudia Schwab / Anna Seal6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Judi Wilson vs Andrea Deitch / Karen Manger6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Teri Barnard
published
3.91
Kara Beene
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Bernadette King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Judi Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.55
Hattie Grimsley
published 4
3.46
Sharyn Quiros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Christie Stephenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lorraine Breidenstein
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Breidenstein + Judi Wilson131152% games+9.2% vs expected
Judi Wilson + Sharyn Quiros232151% games+6.6% vs expected
Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Bernadette King + Judi Wilson101149% games−6.4% vs expected
Lorraine Breidenstein + Nancy Finman2845% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Breidenstein + Bernadette King6451% gamesnot enough data
Kara Beene + Sharyn Quiros6457% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Finman + Judi Wilson7354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Barnard
46W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Bernadette King
50W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Judi Wilson
135W–101L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Sharyn Quiros
96W–91L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Christie Stephenson
42W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lorraine Breidenstein
101W–147L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.