Teams

SDNC 3.5 Fairbanks Ranch CC 9AM/ Gammon

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD Flight 3D

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-10vs SDNC 3.5 Santaluz 10:30AM/ UribeWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Gammon / Beth Mattfolk vs Marla Vandling / Natalia McAvoy6-0, 6-1
2021-04-30vs SDNC 3.5 LLW La Costa / ZielinskiLost 01
L#2 DoublesMINGQING YANG / Beth Mattfolk vs Sarah Knoke / Renee Schardt3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Eppel / MINGQING YANG vs Pam Pickering / Beth Piper4-6, 2-6
2021-04-12vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC 10:30AM/ CrivelloWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanice Eppel / Melanie Rundle vs Jenny Dunlap / Tatiana Bourd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Gammon / Beth Mattfolk vs Jennifer Bucky / Jamie Crivello6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Gammon / Beth Mattfolk vs Jennifer van Riet / Carolyn McCarty6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD Flight 3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jennifer Caringal
published
3.58
Jennifer Meeks
published
3.43
Alison Pasiut
published 3.5
3.32
Clare Lemon
published 3.5
3.32
Lynn Heiman
published 3.5
3.26
Lara Mannell
published 3.5
3.17
Beth Mattfolk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.57
Peggy Semerdjian
published
2.56
Janice Eppel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
MINGQING YANG
published
Susan Gammon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clare Lemon + Lynn Heiman201850% games+0.2% vs expected
Lara Mannell + Alison Pasiut8550% gamesnot enough data
Lara Mannell + Clare Lemon224 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Heiman + Beth Mattfolk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Caringal
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Meeks
23W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Alison Pasiut
36W–28L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Clare Lemon
117W–140L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lynn Heiman
44W–43L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lara Mannell
46W–76L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Beth Mattfolk
21W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Peggy Semerdjian
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Janice Eppel
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56
MINGQING YANG
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Gammon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.