Teams

MEveritt 3.0/4.0

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-23vs PHankersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Joyce / Laura Rendon vs Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall / Roberta Hadley2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDana McNally / Lisa Austin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Dana McNally vs Sharon Fred / Erica Walton1-6, 0-6
2022-07-09vs LKempfLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Eva Garland vs Jeme Avent / Allison Graves1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDana McNally / Melanie Lachance vs Jessica Phillips / Myra Peterson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-25vs CLetcherWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Rendon / Cathy Joyce vs April Bazin / Kaitlin Johnston6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Niezle Scott vs Jane Diepenbrock / Christine Waychoff6-1, 6-4
2022-06-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Joyce / Laura Rendon vs Christine Burr / Camille Conzola7-5, 7-6
2022-06-04vs TriTulenkoLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Lisa Austin vs Elizabeth Faust / Frederica Shipman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Cathy Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Erin McAllister
published 4
3.29
Eva Garland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Lola Jefferies
published
3.09
Elizabeth Schuette
published 3.5
3.08
Camille Gibbs
published 3.5
2.85
Niezle Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Dana McNally
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Schuette + Camille Gibbs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
124W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Erin McAllister
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Eva Garland
50W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lola Jefferies
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth Schuette
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Camille Gibbs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Niezle Scott
39W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dana McNally
32W–67L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.