← Search

Camille Gibbs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 105W–99L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history204 matches
L
2026-06-16 · Er.McAllister40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schuette
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · Er.McAllister40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schuette
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Me.Everitt40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Hemminger
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-08 · Me.Everitt40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schuette
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-25 · Me.Everitt40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schuette
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-04 · Me.Everitt40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zana Piric
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-15 · Me.Everitt40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deno Fonville
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-01 · Me.Everitt40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lan Bello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-17 · Me.Everitt40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-11 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christa Hochstrasser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-21 · Ch.Hochstrasser40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with McGavock Edwards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-20 · Me.Everitt40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deno Fonville
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.5% of games
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 58.9% of games
3.5
56%
28W–22L · 51.6% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
6.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 47.9% of games
7.5
41.5%
17W–24L · 48.7% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 77.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer