Teams

Manheim Smashers - Hanula

2025 USTA 40 & Over League · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-15vs Hempfield - WhiteLost 04
L#1 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Joanne Bosch vs Stephanie Chase / Kristine Johnston3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Hanula vs Andrea Holder6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Francis / Debra Leibig vs Debbie Wetzel / Faith Cowell0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesANGELA SHEA / Kelly Miller vs Kathy Long / Rebecca Durrett3-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs West Shore-Orange (Ruch)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTara Wolfe / Angela Peirce vs Kristie Teets / Sharon Bear6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanne Bosch / Chrissy Eberts vs Lois Jernigan / Diane Rabold2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Debra Leibig vs Julie Himler / Darlene Shughart4-6, 2-6
2025-07-28vs RCW - Rigano/SchlageterSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Chrissy Eberts vs Sandra Callanan / Carolyn Hoch1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNancy Hanula vs Carol Dimm6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJill Hauck / Kelly Miller vs Lore Rigano / Kristin Schlageter6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJamie Hackman / Joanne Bosch vs Carol Blitz / Donna Bollinger5-7, 2-6
2025-07-25vs Hempfield - Strange MagicSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Mary Anne Linde vs Janet Krusen / Kristine Criswell4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Hanula vs Melissa Landis6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Hauck / Tara Wolfe vs Joanne Hess / Alexandra Short0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Miller / Nina Beecher vs Linda Strange / Trisha Pearson6-3, 6-2
2025-07-24vs Hempfield - CampTaitLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Anne Linde / Duffy Johnson vs Dorothy Stubblebine / Donna Grosteffon4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Hanula vs Amanda Caporaletti3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Leibig / Chrissy Eberts vs Sharon Hess / Beth Torrance6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Miller / Jill Brenneman vs Laurie Lingenfelter / Martha Aierstuck1-6, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Bent Creek - MieszkalskiLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Miller / Nina Beecher vs Susan Otoole / Stephanie Zuckerman4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMary Anne Linde vs Megan Maurer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChrissy Eberts / Debra Leibig vs Tricia Stillman / Michelle Sisay4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJill Hauck / Jill Brenneman vs KIM FRUIN / Susan Wolf6-7, 3-6
2025-07-19vs Hempfield-Hangen3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChrissy Eberts / Jill Hauck vs Dorota Gasiorowski / Jillian Keller3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNina Beecher / Tara Wolfe vs Melanie Vanvalkenburgh / Beth Alderman6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Hackman / Joanne Bosch vs Susanne Nimmrichter / Carla Patberg6-3, 6-4
2025-06-30vs Wisehaven - MyersLost 03
L#1 DoublesTara Wolfe / Angela Peirce vs Sheryl Stoll / Cynthia Crowley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Jill Hauck vs Rita Potter / Carisa Husak2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Christman / Kimberly Topf vs Holly Rishel / Jennifer Small4-6, 3-6
2025-05-27vs Hershey Racquet Stars (Salinger)Split 22
W#1 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Kristin Jeffries / Kristy Hansen7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Anne Linde vs Andrea Hamilton2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Joanne Bosch vs Maria Salinger / Deborah Weaver6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Leibig / ANGELA SHEA vs Melissa Mellott / Lisa Torchia6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Cindy Rohrbaugh / Diane Greenholt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNancy Hanula vs Lesley Maurer7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Anne Linde / Nina Beecher vs Eva Hess Phillips / Amy Pomraning4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoanne Bosch / Chrissy Eberts vs Monica Bajaj / Steffie Cannella Beck5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hempfield - Strange Magic010291128284
2Hershey Racquet Stars (Salinger)010241639348
3Hempfield - CampTait010231743341
4Wisehaven - Myers010221844353
5Hempfield - White010182251379
6West Shore-Orange (Ruch)010162454391
7RCW - Rigano/Schlageter010162455401
8Hempfield-Hangen3.5010132756397
9Hanover - Racquet Rebels (Phillips)010172357409
10Manheim Smashers - Hanula010132759424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Mary Anne Linde
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Chrissy Eberts
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.16
Angela Peirce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Nina Beecher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Hanula
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Amanda Christman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Duffy Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Joanne Bosch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Debra Leibig
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.72
ANGELA SHEA
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Kimberly Topf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jacqueline Francis
published
Jamie Hackman
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Jill Brenneman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Hauck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tara Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Hanula + Amanda Christman5654% games+11.8% vs expected
Tara Wolfe + Angela Peirce211952% games+2.0% vs expected
Jamie Hackman + Jill Hauck4651% games+1.8% vs expected
Mary Anne Linde + Duffy Johnson4349% games−2.7% vs expected
Joanne Bosch + Duffy Johnson31242% games−5.7% vs expected
Nancy Hanula + Joanne Bosch1435% games−7.8% vs expected
Chrissy Eberts + Amanda Christman4253% gamesnot enough data
Chrissy Eberts + Joanne Bosch1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Anne Linde
56W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chrissy Eberts
89W–89L career · 14 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Angela Peirce
90W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Nina Beecher
86W–125L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nancy Hanula
72W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amanda Christman
28W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Duffy Johnson
118W–124L career · 7 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Joanne Bosch
32W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debra Leibig
20W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
ANGELA SHEA
92W–148L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Kimberly Topf
49W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Jacqueline Francis
85W–67L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Hackman
47W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Brenneman
33W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Hauck
142W–138L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Wolfe
56W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.