Teams

JWaleski (OPRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-23vs VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Haywood / Jennifer Danesis vs Loretta Anderson / Erin Pacilli6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Irick / Sarah Hawkins vs Teresa Richardson / Giuliana Bolanos7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Alison Milas vs Amy Baumgartner / Vanessa Pomfrey6-1, 1-1
2024-09-23vs MZvara (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMaren Juell / Keiran Llaneza vs Leigh Rogers / Margo Cash6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicole Woodley / Josey Waleski vs Mallory Zvara / Ellen McCarley6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Spence / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Haley Cheek / Jennie Corbett6-0, 6-4
2024-09-09vs MHabegger/LRosser (Queens)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMaren Juell / Keiran Llaneza vs Laurie Rosser / Blair Diamond6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Danesis / Kathy Spence vs Amy Kinder / Dany Marie4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Alison Milas vs Melissa Habegger / Monica Turner6-7, 4-6
2024-08-26vs MWalters (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Danesis / Katie Haywood vs Sara Porrata / Jennifer Hutson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaren Juell / Keiran Llaneza vs Meghan Walters / Kelly Lilly6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatrina Schellhorn / Georgia Buck vs Stefania Faraj / Kristin Thompson6-0, 6-3
2024-08-19vs BMarks (Providence CC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJosey Waleski / Laura Irick vs Alison Hider / Karen Claffey4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatrina Schellhorn / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Kristin Heidkamp / Stacy Figgs Sokhi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKeiran Llaneza / Maren Juell vs Jessica Salzman / Robin Marks6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Milas / Kathy Spence vs Juliana Comeau / Jodi Warner6-1, 6-0
2024-08-05vs DShealy/JHerlong (FCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKeiran Llaneza / Jennifer Danesis vs Wendy Hall / Jennifer Herlong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJosey Waleski / Katie Haywood vs Christina Pardi / Jennifer Voci6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMaren Juell / Kathy Spence vs Danielle Shealy / Tara Wilson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Erin Lentz
published
3.72
Katie Haywood
published
3.62
Nicole Woodley
published
3.48
Maren Juell
published
3.44
Kathy Spence
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Laura Irick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jennifer Danesis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Keiran Llaneza
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Megan Bimbo
published
3.20
Josey Waleski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Katrina Schellhorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Alison Milas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Sarah Hawkins
published
3.05
Georgia Buck
published
3.02
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Danesis + Keiran Llaneza9458% games+6.7% vs expected
Nicole Woodley + Erin Lentz6357% games+4.8% vs expected
Katrina Schellhorn + Jimena Lozano de Bermudez11358% games−1.2% vs expected
Laura Irick + Josey Waleski8456% games−1.4% vs expected
Jennifer Danesis + Josey Waleski7357% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Spence + Jimena Lozano de Bermudez6166% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Spence + Alison Milas1650% gamesnot enough data
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez + Alison Milas4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Lentz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Katie Haywood
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Nicole Woodley
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Maren Juell
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Kathy Spence
41W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Laura Irick
41W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Jennifer Danesis
65W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Keiran Llaneza
103W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Megan Bimbo
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Josey Waleski
67W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Katrina Schellhorn
22W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Alison Milas
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.14
Sarah Hawkins
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.08
Georgia Buck
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
58W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.