Teams

TOC.Leahy

2025 CTRL Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 40 & Over 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Jamie Huang vs Katie Baker / Andrew Baker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-16vs MD.HaleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Michelle Spangenberg / Grayson Hale4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShelly Jude / Scott Daniel vs Brooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls6-4, 6-3
2025-07-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Daniel / Pamela Godwin vs Timothy Koves / Amanda Fish0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Sarah Hall / Daniel McDonald3-6, 2-6
2025-07-05vs TOC.KimLost 02
L#2 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Nishant Mohan / Miho Ogura1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Daniel / Pamela Godwin vs Tanya Barcinas / David Hofberg5-7, 3-6
2025-06-28vs TOC.MerckLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Palmer / Monica Palmer vs Ted Cetola / Lisa Carley2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott Daniel / Pamela Godwin vs John Jabusch / Stephanie Jabusch3-6, 4-6
2025-06-14vs LOCH.PeltLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Rodriguez / Shelly Jude vs Brian Heaphy / Michelle Hoyles1-6, 0-6
2025-05-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Katie Baker / Andrew Baker6-7, 2-6
2025-05-24vs TOC.ClarkLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelly Jude / Jon Rodriguez vs Devon Siege / Timothy Koves1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Palmer / Michael Palmer vs Shirley Kim / Carlos Kim3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Shelly Jude
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.09
Monica Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Jamie Huang
published
2.98
Scott Daniel
published
2.92
Daniel Horowitz
published 3.5
2.78
Pamela Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Leahy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–160L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Monica Palmer
15W–51L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jamie Huang
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Daniel Horowitz
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Pamela Godwin
50W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Jennifer Leahy
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.