Teams

MD.Hale

2025 CTRL Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 40 & Over 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs TOC.KimLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Chuang / Chris Chuang vs Lisa Kempf / Greg Kempf6-7, 3-6
2025-07-16vs TOC.LeahySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Spangenberg / Grayson Hale vs Monica Palmer / Michael Palmer6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs Shelly Jude / Scott Daniel4-6, 3-6
2025-07-09vs LOCH.PeltWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Kuehn / Michelle Spangenberg vs Joseph Holsopple / Kara Hornada7-5, 6-2
2025-06-08vs TOC.MerckLost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Chuang / Linda Chuang vs Jeffrey Hungarter / Katie Hungarter6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-07vs TOC.ClarkLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Cesta / Chris Chuang vs LUCY LAV / Chun Lav7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs Devon Siege / Steve Pigora3-6, 1-6
2025-05-31vs TOC.KimSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Lee / Michelle Spangenberg vs Vimal Kumar / Miho Ogura3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls vs Connie Kim / Glen Steinhardt1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Michelle Spangenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Casey Hale
published 3.5
3.32
Chris Chuang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Grayson Hale
published
3.10
Brooke Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Claire Cesta
published 3.5
3.07
Colleen Davis
published 3.5
3.06
Linda Chuang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Bobby Rawls
published 3
Gary Kuehn
published
Gray Rogers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Chuang + Chris Chuang16857% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Spangenberg
185W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
3.5
Casey Hale
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Chris Chuang
76W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Grayson Hale
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brooke Rawls
196W–121L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Claire Cesta
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Colleen Davis
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Linda Chuang
187W–110L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Bobby Rawls
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Gary Kuehn
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gray Rogers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.