Teams

Olde Towne (Dennie Clark)

USTA Atlanta Spring - Men's 70's Round Robin · 3.5 (Play is on Fridays)

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-30vs Windermere (Bob Sutton)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRene Ginepri / Charles Matheson vs Jim Javors / John Adeimy3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKen Leebow / George Wagner vs Jack Cerny / Randy McKee4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJagjeet Sidhu / Dennie Clark vs Manuel Santana / Ron Neal4-6, 3-2
2025-05-24vs Martin's Landing (Mike Wiggin)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRene Ginepri / Alan Cristal vs Joe Stezzi / William Malloy5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Rappe / Steve Loomis vs Russ Deluca / Alan Porter1-6, 1-6
2025-05-16vs Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Rappe / Charles Matheson vs Neil Schor / Terence Furness2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDennie Clark / George Wagner vs Greg Foss / Robert Scaringe1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKen Leebow / Richie Pereira vs Frank Rannou / Joe Marks2-6, 3-6
2025-05-09vs Park Brooke (Neil Paauwe)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Matheson / David Rappe vs Bill Davis / John Passarella0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDennie Clark / George Wagner vs James Lyons / Roger Johnston1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKen Leebow / Irv Zimmerman vs Charles Campbell / Neil Nickelsen3-6, 3-6
2025-04-30vs Chadds Walk (Michael Rose)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Cox / Steve Loomis vs Robert Seckington / James Huggins0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRene Ginepri / Irving Briks vs William Duty / Bruce McGinley3-6, 4-6
2025-04-25vs Windermere (Bob Sutton)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Case / Irv Zimmerman vs Bob Sutton / Greg Kask2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDennie Clark / Irving Briks vs Jim Javors / Mike Mc Gee0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Matheson / Rene Ginepri vs Alan Herman / John Green1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 (Play is on Fridays)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chadds Walk (Michael Rose)*60153684
2Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*4212613119
3Park Brooke (Neil Paauwe)*4212614138
4Soleil (Chuck Lampman)*4210817136
5Windermere (Bob Sutton)*3311715141
6Kennworth TC (Bob Christmas)*339921155
7Cherokee TC (William Price)*3381023170
8Bridgemill (Robert Dodge)*249922174
9Martin's Landing (Mike Wiggin)*1521632206
10Olde Towne (Dennie Clark)0621632193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
George Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Rene Ginepri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Charles Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Paul Case
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Irv Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Dennie Clark
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
David Rappe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Jagjeet Sidhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Steve Loomis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Richie Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Ken Leebow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Michael Lefort
published
2.45
Alan Cristal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Irving Briks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Cox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Loomis + Dennie Clark2549% games+5.7% vs expected
Steve Loomis + Paul Case5450% games+3.0% vs expected
David Rappe + Michael Lefort3742% games−0.4% vs expected
Steve Loomis + David Rappe1543% gamesnot enough data
Alan Cristal + Rene Ginepri3254% gamesnot enough data
Steve Loomis + Irv Zimmerman2354% gamesnot enough data
David Rappe + Richie Pereira2349% gamesnot enough data
Paul Case + Dennie Clark134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Wagner
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Rene Ginepri
44W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Charles Matheson
18W–41L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Paul Case
13W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Irv Zimmerman
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Dennie Clark
23W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
David Rappe
19W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jagjeet Sidhu
10W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Steve Loomis
27W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Richie Pereira
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Ken Leebow
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Michael Lefort
11W–29L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Alan Cristal
16W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Irving Briks
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Cox
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.