Teams

Park Brooke (Neil Paauwe)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - Men's 70's Round Robin · 3.5 (Play is on Fridays)

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-02vs Chadds Walk (Michael Rose)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs Mark Gottlieb / James Huggins6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAl Hicks / Roger Johnston vs William Duty / Robert Seckington0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Campbell / Duane Malloy vs Robert Anderson / C Moss3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-23vs Windermere (Bob Sutton)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs Dennis Atkinson / John Green6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoger Johnston / Neil Nickelsen vs Greg Kask / Randy McKee2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAl Hicks / Bob Uszynski vs Alan Herman / Brad Wonnacott7-6, 7-6
2025-05-16vs Martin's Landing (Mike Wiggin)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs Russ Deluca / Joe Stezzi6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Caldwell / J Robert Hardcastle vs Peter Pernice / Michael Powell6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCharles Campbell / Bob Uszynski vs Wayne Cook / Craig Meredith6-0, 6-1
2025-05-09vs Olde Towne (Dennie Clark)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs Charles Matheson / David Rappe6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Lyons / Roger Johnston vs Dennie Clark / George Wagner6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Campbell / Neil Nickelsen vs Ken Leebow / Irv Zimmerman6-3, 6-3
2025-05-02vs Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs Stanley Joffe / Ken Rutledge6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAl Hicks / Bob Uszynski vs Terence Furness / Neil Schor2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Johnston / Bharat Ragha vs Greg Foss / Joe Marks6-4, 6-2
2025-04-25vs Chadds Walk (Michael Rose)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Davis / John Passarella vs William Duty / Bruce McGinley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Caldwell / J Robert Hardcastle vs James Huggins / Dave Tipton3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBill Ware / Neil Paauwe vs Scott Holton / Michael Rose1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 (Play is on Fridays)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chadds Walk (Michael Rose)*60153684
2Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*4212613119
3Park Brooke (Neil Paauwe)*4212614138
4Soleil (Chuck Lampman)*4210817136
5Windermere (Bob Sutton)*3311715141
6Kennworth TC (Bob Christmas)*339921155
7Cherokee TC (William Price)*3381023170
8Bridgemill (Robert Dodge)*249922174
9Martin's Landing (Mike Wiggin)*1521632206
10Olde Towne (Dennie Clark)0621632193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
John Passarella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Bill Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Bharat Ragha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Duane Malloy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Roger Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Bill Ware
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Charles Campbell
published 3.5
3.09
Bob Uszynski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Al Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Neil Paauwe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
James Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Moran
published
James Lyons
published
John Jacobson
published
Neil Nickelsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Passarella + Bill Davis12365% games+4.0% vs expected
James Lyons + Neil Paauwe4356% games−3.4% vs expected
James Caldwell + Neil Paauwe51239% games−5.2% vs expected
James Caldwell + Bill Ware11033% games−7.0% vs expected
Neil Nickelsen + Neil Paauwe1631% gamesnot enough data
James Caldwell + Roger Johnston0636% gamesnot enough data
Bill Davis + Duane Malloy1541% gamesnot enough data
Bill Ware + Neil Paauwe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Passarella
43W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Bill Davis
26W–25L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Bharat Ragha
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Duane Malloy
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Roger Johnston
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bill Ware
10W–27L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Charles Campbell
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bob Uszynski
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Al Hicks
2W–3L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Neil Paauwe
41W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
James Caldwell
40W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Frank Moran
10W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
James Lyons
59W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Jacobson
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Neil Nickelsen
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.