Teams

Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 5.0 Men, S

5 players · average NTRP 5.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Lew / Michael Scanlon vs Connor Dunn / Joshua Hsia0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJason Denton / Kyle Johnson vs David Chader / Kent Whitener6-1, 7-5
2026-07-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Denton / Matthew Moody vs Tom Ciszewski / Joshua Cooper6-7, 6-7
2026-06-30vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Denton / Michael Scanlon vs Connor Dunn / Christian Settles4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMiguel Flores / Brandon Lew vs David Chader / Marius Schmitt1-6, 5-7
2026-06-23vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMiguel Flores / Brandon Lew vs David Chader / Tom Ciszewski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Moody / Michael Scanlon vs Kent Whitener / Christian Settles6-7, 4-6
2026-06-16vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMiguel Flores / Michael Scanlon vs Connor Dunn / Seth Gochnauer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lew / Matthew Moody vs Joshua Cooper / David Chader6-7, 4-6
2026-06-09vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Denton / Michael Scanlon vs David Chader / Christian Settles3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Johnson / Matthew Moody vs Seth Gochnauer / Joshua Hsia7-5, 6-2
2026-06-03vs IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Johnson / Michael Scanlon vs David Chader / Tom Ciszewski3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJason Denton / Matthew Moody vs Connor Dunn / Christian Settles0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CIN Indy 18 & Over 5.0 Men, S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN/Whitener/A18&Over5.0M43111021200
2Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton34101125204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Michael Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.37
Jason Denton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.37
Brandon Lew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.12
Matthew Moody
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Miguel Flores
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Denton + Michael Scanlon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Scanlon
74W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
Jason Denton
115W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.37
5
Brandon Lew
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
Matthew Moody
30W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Miguel Flores
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.