← Search

Michael Scanlon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 76W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brandon Lew
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Denton
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthew Moody
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Miguel Flores
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Denton
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-05 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Indy A18 5.0M NCHS Denton · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kyle Johnson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-29 · IN/Denton/X18&Over10.0 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Lucy Loy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · IN/Denton/X18&Over10.0 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Madelyn Bond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · IN/Denton/X18&Over10.0 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Madelyn Bond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · Indy X18 9.0 MRC Cooper · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
4.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.9% of games
5.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.3% of games
8.5mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.3% of games
9.0mixed
80.8%
21W–5L · 60% of games
9.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal