Teams

V WD -LLW One Love / Rancho Madera-House

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Summer Williamson
published
3.65
Lisa Cloughesy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Sherri Murphy
published
3.55
Aimee Alejandre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Brenda King
published 3.5
3.40
Cheri Ackermann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.40
Kathleen Gyllenhaal
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.35
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.32
Jane Turner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.29
Wendy Schoenburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Nancy Brightwell
published
3.19
Laura Leff
published
3.09
Karen Solomon
published
3.01
Susan Friedman
published
3.01
Ruth Wager
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Murphy + Jo Ann Thrailkill6072% games+12.3% vs expected
Wendy Schoenburg + Cheri Ackermann402254% games−0.8% vs expected
Aimee Alejandre + Lisa Cloughesy404 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Murphy + Catherine Haggett213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Schoenburg + Aimee Alejandre033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Friedman + Karen Solomon033 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Catherine Haggett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Williamson
48W–26L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.69
4
Lisa Cloughesy
50W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Sherri Murphy
39W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.62
3.5
Aimee Alejandre
81W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Brenda King
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
3.5
Cheri Ackermann
132W–87L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Kathleen Gyllenhaal
67W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Jane Turner
30W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Wendy Schoenburg
200W–104L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Nancy Brightwell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Laura Leff
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Karen Solomon
4W–23L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Ruth Wager
62W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
57W–134L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.