Teams

4.TOC.Davis

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-22vs 6.TOC.PilandLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Pelphrey / Brian Noga vs Matt Piland / Cameron Pope4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-15vs 5.TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Noga / Justin Fowler vs Shirish Javalkar / Claude Ruffieux6-2, 6-1
2022-05-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Noga / Justin Mauney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs 8.TOHS.BrownLost 02
L#1 DoublesErik J Erikson / Cody Vinson vs Ben Glass / Stephen Laroche5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBradford Aron / Anthony Davis vs Brennan Doran / Aaron Hiller3-6, 1-6
2022-04-03vs 2.MD.JenningsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBradford Aron / John Pelphrey vs Chris Crumpler / Jerfi Cicin2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCody Vinson / Justin Fowler vs Andrew Ligay / James Moriarty7-5, 6-1
2022-03-20vs 3.TOC AlbertWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Davis / Bradford Aron vs Yubie Albert / Guillermo Velarde6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
James Miron
published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.24
Erik J Erikson
published 4.5
4.21
Cody Vinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Bradford Aron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Ryan Walter
published
4.06
John Pelphrey
published
3.95
Brian Noga
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Justin Fowler
published
3.68
Justin Mauney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cody Vinson + Bradford Aron123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Miron
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Erik J Erikson
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Cody Vinson
176W–133L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Bradford Aron
112W–129L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Ryan Walter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
John Pelphrey
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Brian Noga
62W–45L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
Justin Fowler
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Enric Prat Codina
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Justin Mauney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.