Teams

2.MD.Jennings

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-05vs 3.TOC AlbertLost 02
L#2 DoublesJerfi Cicin / Tom Larrichio vs Alex Renfrow / Wes Watson6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVance Jennings vs George Newsome6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-22vs 8.TOHS.BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Crumpler / Vance Jennings vs Casey Black / Brennan Doran5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-08vs 6.TOC.PilandLost 01
L#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Todd Garcia vs Michael Benkowitz / Matt Piland3-6, 5-7
2022-04-03vs 4.TOC.DavisWon 20
W#1 DoublesVance Jennings / Todd Garcia vs Anthony Davis / Erik J Erikson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Crumpler / Jerfi Cicin vs Bradford Aron / John Pelphrey6-2, 6-4
2022-03-20vs 5.TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Crumpler / Tom Larrichio vs Cecil Turner / PETER SELF6-4, 6-3
2022-03-11Split 11
W#2 DoublesTom Larrichio / Chris Crumpler vs Jack Burgess / Brian Burgess6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Winzenz / Vance Jennings vs Jonathan Chang / Artur Wilk6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Todd Garcia
published
4.28
Vance Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.22
Chris Crumpler
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.09
Jerfi Cicin
published
4.02
Tom Larrichio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andrew Winzenz
published 4
3.64
James Moriarty
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vance Jennings + Chris Crumpler101351% games−5.5% vs expected
Tom Larrichio + Chris Crumpler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Garcia
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Vance Jennings
106W–79L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Chris Crumpler
62W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Jerfi Cicin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Tom Larrichio
132W–95L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Andrew Winzenz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Moriarty
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.