Teams

Team 7 Wise Ace GOATs

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-05vs Team 1 DMV Tennis ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Sendich / Yong Kim vs Krishna Polisetty / Jihoon Kim0-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs Team 2 Who Is We? EvolutionSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Davis / Marc Sendich vs Kevin Hough / Jason Hecker4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Gorvett / Milin Iyer vs Lakshmi Sateesh Kommineni / SHANE MURRAY6-1, 6-0
2025-03-15vs Team 5 Winter Serve-acesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMilin Iyer / Tom Bickley vs Muthukrishnan Ganesan / Ronald Oberbillig5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Chang / Mohit Sehgal vs Jacques Oliver / Jordan Glashow6-7, 3-1
2025-02-14vs Team 3 High VoltageLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnthony Chang / Marc Sendich vs Sai Maddi / Raj Indugula7-5, 3-5
2025-02-03vs Team 10 Franklin FarmersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMilin Iyer / Anthony Chang vs Calvin Nguyen / Lamson Nguyen2-6, 3-6
2025-01-13vs Team 8 RBGCC 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesMohit Sehgal / Marc Sendich vs Mel Wesley / David Scully6-2, 6-2
2025-01-09vs Team 6 Top ShelfLost 01
L#3 DoublesHelmut Klemperer / Marc Sendich vs Jay Chapman / ZACHARY MOFFATT4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Alan Ogilvie
published 4
3.78
Mohit Sehgal
published
3.76
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
published
3.67
David Viar
published 3.5
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Marc Sendich
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Anthony Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.27
Yong Kim
published
Helmut Klemperer
published
Tam Banh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Chang + Marc Sendich2355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alan Ogilvie
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Mohit Sehgal
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Marc Sendich
109W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Anthony Chang
249W–160L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Helmut Klemperer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tam Banh
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.