Teams

Lambert: 65+ 9.0 Summer

2026 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 Men S26

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs 65+ 9.0 Acc. TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Claar / Brian Biernat vs Richard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon6-3
2026-07-20vs 65+ 9.0 Acc. TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Claar / Brian Biernat vs Edwin Freeman / Craig Ballentine7-6
2026-07-08vs 65+ 9.0 Acc. TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Lambert / Glenn Britzius vs Richard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Kenneth Cychosz vs Craig Ballentine / Mike Jones6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Alevizos / Randy Crowell vs Edwin Freeman / David Fishbaine7-6
2026-07-08vs 65+ 9.0 Acc. TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Lambert / Glenn Britzius vs Craig Ballentine / James Rick6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Kenneth Cychosz vs Richard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Alevizos / Randy Crowell vs Edwin Freeman / Mike Jones6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Men S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lambert: 65+ 9.0 Summer40120022
265+ 9.0 Acc. Team040121274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Daniel Boulay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Karl Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Kenneth Cychosz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Brian Biernat
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Mark Alevizos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Glenn Britzius
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Crowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Claar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Boulay + Karl Lambert134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Boulay
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Karl Lambert
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
Kenneth Cychosz
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
Brian Biernat
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.05
Mark Alevizos
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
Glenn Britzius
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Crowell
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Claar
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.