Teams

65+ 9.0 Acc. Team

2026 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 Men S26

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs Lambert: 65+ 9.0 SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon vs Tim Claar / Brian Biernat3-6
2026-07-20vs Lambert: 65+ 9.0 SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdwin Freeman / Craig Ballentine vs Tim Claar / Brian Biernat6-7
2026-07-08vs Lambert: 65+ 9.0 SummerLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon vs Karl Lambert / Glenn Britzius1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Ballentine / Mike Jones vs Daniel Boulay / Kenneth Cychosz2-6
L#3 DoublesEdwin Freeman / David Fishbaine vs Mark Alevizos / Randy Crowell6-7
2026-07-08vs Lambert: 65+ 9.0 SummerLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Ballentine / James Rick vs Karl Lambert / Glenn Britzius0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Schroeder / Doug MacGibbon vs Daniel Boulay / Kenneth Cychosz2-6
L#3 DoublesEdwin Freeman / Mike Jones vs Mark Alevizos / Randy Crowell2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Men S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lambert: 65+ 9.0 Summer40120022
265+ 9.0 Acc. Team040121274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Karl Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
David Fishbaine
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Bruce Goad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Edwin Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Doug MacGibbon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Craig Ballentine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
James Rick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
John Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Jones
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Jones + Edwin Freeman2447% gamesnot enough data
Doug MacGibbon + Bruce Goad213 matchesnot enough data
Doug MacGibbon + Richard Schroeder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karl Lambert
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
David Fishbaine
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Bruce Goad
49W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Edwin Freeman
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Doug MacGibbon
13W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Craig Ballentine
19W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
James Rick
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.34
John Hickey
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Jones
118W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Schroeder
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.