Teams

CACM GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs GTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEllie Carothers Kelly / Sarah Payne vs Kelly Goodnough / Maureen Clarke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Bonnie King6-2, 6-4
2023-08-30vs CACM SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesShanna Weber / Sarah Payne vs Elizabeth Anderman / Amy Dre2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEllie Carothers Kelly vs Katherine Cuevas6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAUSRA MOLLERUD / Angie Demetulias vs Leigh Kingman / Eden Parker2-6, 3-6
2023-08-23vs SKY GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesShanna Weber / Willa FAWER vs Sara Visser / Katie Garrison2-6, 2-6
2023-08-16vs CP BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Susan Pesso4-6, 3-6
2023-08-09vs CM GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAUSRA MOLLERUD / Ellie Carothers Kelly vs Meghan Wolfe / Anne Gordon7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-02vs WP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesShanna Weber / Belle Kammer vs Cameran Jewell / Susanna Eckelberger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Lexie Haggerty6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlicia Quirolo / Ellie Carothers Kelly vs Kate Harvey / Kelly Harvey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-26vs DTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Quirolo / Shanna Weber vs Elaina Grauer / Krista Yamamoto2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Elisabeth Vezzani2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Payne / Ellie Carothers Kelly vs Brenda Byrne / Jennifer Monks4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
AUSRA MOLLERUD
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Ellie Carothers Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Angie Demetulias
published 3.5
2.83
Willa FAWER
published
2.82
Shanna Weber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shanna Weber + AUSRA MOLLERUD123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AUSRA MOLLERUD
69W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ellie Carothers Kelly
31W–26L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Angie Demetulias
18W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Willa FAWER
29W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Shanna Weber
34W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.