Teams

CACM SILVER

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs DTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Elizabeth Anderman vs Brenda Byrne / Evelyn Price6-1, 6-3
2023-08-30vs CACM GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Anderman / Amy Dre vs Shanna Weber / Sarah Payne6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Eden Parker vs AUSRA MOLLERUD / Angie Demetulias6-2, 6-3
2023-08-23vs GTC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Eden Parker vs Maureen Clarke / Karen Ryan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Dre / Elizabeth Anderman vs Mary Albair / Ginny Crise6-1, 6-2
2023-08-16vs SKY GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Eden Parker vs Erin Mann / Angie Sanders7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs CP BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Lisa Allen vs Amy Twardowski / Erin Dunn7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-02vs CM GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Kingman / Eden Parker vs Anne Gordon / Polly Warner6-2, 6-2
2023-07-26vs WP REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderman / Britt Nielsen vs Jane Reimer / Lexie Haggerty7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Eden Parker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Amy Dre
published 3.5
3.12
Katherine Cuevas
published
2.67
Leigh Kingman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Elizabeth Anderman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.32
Britt Nielsen
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eden Parker + Leigh Kingman221156% games+6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eden Parker
125W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Amy Dre
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Katherine Cuevas
38W–29L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Leigh Kingman
84W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Elizabeth Anderman
34W–55L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Britt Nielsen
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.