Teams

Marion/Dellovade

2025 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-01vs CCO SteedWon 20
W#1 DoublesMadison Sagas / Abigail Dellovade vs Lisa Steed / Penny Terry7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Maria Oliver vs Susan Atwell / Elise Atwell6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-24vs FK BarletWon 10
W#2 DoublesMadison Sagas / Abigail Dellovade vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Judith Bertran6-1, 6-1
2025-11-21vs FK BarletWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Royo / Sharon Christie Ybanez vs Bonnie Keating / Melissa Justis1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Sagas / Abigail Dellovade vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Andrea Love6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-11-10vs CCO SteedWon 10
W#2 DoublesMadison Sagas / Melissa Galloway vs Lisa Steed / Pamela Rice6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs CCO SteedLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Galloway / Eileen Lombardo vs Pamela Rice / Amanda Miller6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-27vs FK BarletLost 02
L#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Kayleen Quinn vs Jenny Neelands / Melissa Justis1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDina Sapienza / Sharon Christie Ybanez vs Irina Madorsky / Ashley Spink7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Madison Sagas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.97
Diana Royo
published 4
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.77
Abigail Dellovade
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.40
Maria Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Lucy Kaul
published
3.17
Sharon Christie Ybanez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kayleen Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole DeBolt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Christie Ybanez + Eileen Lombardo11557% games+7.1% vs expected
Madison Sagas + Abigail Dellovade6071% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Christie Ybanez + Abigail Dellovade123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Abigail Dellovade
137W–49L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Maria Oliver
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Sharon Christie Ybanez
72W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Kayleen Quinn
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole DeBolt
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.