Teams

CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Tam Robbie Sun 11 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O M 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesDavid Louis / Andrew Rubanovich vs Jeric Johnson / Gerald Gallagher7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRandy Robbie / Thomas Conway vs Alan Mesh / David Cintron Jr6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Matthew Newman vs James Engel / Gregory Franzo6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChuck Zitnick / Clyde Woods vs Bob King / Richard McLean3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJim Fine / Chuck Blumenthal vs Eric Esancy / Alfred Ramirez6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Brad Schneider vs Shawn Erickson / Nick Kouvelis2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChuck Zitnick / Andrew Rubanovich vs Emil Filipov / Dave Carlquist3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Schneider / Reid Adler vs Emil Filipov / Alan Halleck6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Pelini / Kevin Lookis vs Jamie Gozy / Nick Kouvelis6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChuck Zitnick / Clyde Woods vs James Engel / Gregory Franzo7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Louis / Kevin Lookis vs Eric Esancy / Alfred Ramirez2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Clyde Woods vs Randy Curtis / Jim Capuano7-5, 5-4
L#2 DoublesAndrew Rubanovich / Chris Goedde vs Peter Brecknock / Donald Roubitchek2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJim Fine / Randy Robbie vs Neal Johnson / Phil Frederickson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Washa / Andrew Pappas vs Robert Barry / Phil Debuhr7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesMarc Pelini / Chris Goedde vs Robert Senft / Orville Ankarlo6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesReid Adler / Clyde Woods vs David Cintron Jr / Craig Sieben6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Fine / Chris Goedde vs Don Duszynski / Alan Mesh6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O M 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Oak Brook Franzo Sun 7 $206216820178
2CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Tam Robbie Sun 11 $226215921184
3CDTA E 55&O M7.0 River Trails Levin/Brodsky Sun 2 $2244131126193
4CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $1744131128217
5(DROPPED) CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Naperville Esancy Sat 4 $22000000
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 55&O M7.0 MT Bann Swartz Sat 4 $25000000
7CDTA E 55&O M7.0 MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $280832142255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Chuck Blumenthal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Chuck Zitnick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Andrew Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brian Washa
published 3.5
3.20
Chris Goedde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
David Louis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Clyde Woods
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Marc Pelini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Andrew Rubanovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brad Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Fine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Lookis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Newman
published
Randy Robbie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Reid Adler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Conway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Robbie + Jim Fine8949% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Rubanovich + Chris Goedde41049% gamesnot enough data
Chuck Zitnick + Clyde Woods10264% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Lookis + Andrew Rubanovich3840% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Rubanovich + Chuck Blumenthal5451% gamesnot enough data
Randy Robbie + Marc Pelini3346% gamesnot enough data
Randy Robbie + Chris Goedde0631% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Rubanovich + Clyde Woods3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chuck Blumenthal
50W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Chuck Zitnick
42W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Andrew Pappas
142W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Brian Washa
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Chris Goedde
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
David Louis
30W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Clyde Woods
58W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Marc Pelini
41W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Andrew Rubanovich
75W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Brad Schneider
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jim Fine
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Lookis
10W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Newman
62W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Robbie
28W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Reid Adler
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Conway
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.