Teams

CDTA E 55&O M7.0 MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $28

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O M 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.22 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesJeric Johnson / Gerald Gallagher vs David Louis / Andrew Rubanovich5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Mesh / David Cintron Jr vs Randy Robbie / Thomas Conway1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDon Duszynski / Gerald Gallagher vs Jeffrey Porto / Robert Senft2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Mesh / Craig Sieben vs David MacK / Orville Ankarlo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarry Gork / David Cintron Jr vs Neal Johnson / Phil Frederickson2-6, 0-6
2022-11-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlan Mesh / David Cintron Jr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBarry Marks / Alan Mesh vs Phil Debuhr / Robert Senft3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Cintron Jr / William Johnson vs Robert Barry / Jens Borchert4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesDavid Cintron Jr / Don Duszynski vs Shawn Erickson / Michael Roth1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Johnson / Alan Mesh vs Emil Filipov / Nick Kouvelis0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesBarry Marks / Don Duszynski vs Bob King / Charles Schinzer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Lyden / Barry Gork vs Slawomir Michalak / Lester Pawula2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGerald Gallagher / David Cintron Jr vs Rick Jett / Daniel McDowell2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesCraig Sieben / Jeric Johnson vs James Engel / Gregory Franzo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Johnson / David Cintron Jr vs Lester Pawula / Charles Schinzer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTom Samson / George Engeln vs David Baird / Rick Jett0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Cintron Jr / Craig Sieben vs Reid Adler / Clyde Woods4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDon Duszynski / Alan Mesh vs Jim Fine / Chris Goedde1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O M 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Oak Brook Franzo Sun 7 $206216820178
2CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Tam Robbie Sun 11 $226215921184
3CDTA E 55&O M7.0 River Trails Levin/Brodsky Sun 2 $2244131126193
4CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $1744131128217
5(DROPPED) CDTA E 55&O M7.0 Naperville Esancy Sat 4 $22000000
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 55&O M7.0 MT Bann Swartz Sat 4 $25000000
7CDTA E 55&O M7.0 MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $280832142255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Barry Marks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Joseph Lyden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Craig Sieben
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Gerald Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Barry Gork
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
David Cintron Jr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Don Duszynski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Alan Mesh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
George Engeln
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeric Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Samson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barry Gork + David Cintron Jr41330% games−7.0% vs expected
Alan Mesh + Barry Gork1724% games−8.7% vs expected
David Cintron Jr + Gerald Gallagher2736% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Lyden + Alan Mesh3447% gamesnot enough data
Alan Mesh + David Cintron Jr2441% gamesnot enough data
Barry Gork + Tom Samson068% gamesnot enough data
Alan Mesh + Tom Samson058% gamesnot enough data
Don Duszynski + Alan Mesh044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Marks
35W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Joseph Lyden
66W–115L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Craig Sieben
13W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Gerald Gallagher
21W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Barry Gork
43W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
David Cintron Jr
37W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Don Duszynski
6W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Alan Mesh
51W–167L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
George Engeln
1W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Jeric Johnson
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Samson
1W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.