Teams

Yancey- VikQueens 7.0 55+ Day S23

2023 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 7.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lynne Rasmussen
published
3.46
Sarah Tuel
published
3.46
Barb Brown
published 3.5
3.38
Brigitte Schiller
published 3.5
Christine Rowe
published 3.5
3.22
Jill Langer
published
3.21
Amy Haugen
published 3.5
3.17
Jacie Hurd
published
3.11
Nancy Koch
published
3.10
Sarah LeDoux
published
3.09
Marcia Harris
published
3.06
Kathy Burns
published
2.79
Penelope Prescott
published
Kitty Yancey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Burns + Sarah LeDoux5744% games+1.1% vs expected
Marcia Harris + Jill Langer3547% games−3.3% vs expected
Kathy Burns + Barb Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Harris + Barb Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Rasmussen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
Sarah Tuel
75W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Barb Brown
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Brigitte Schiller
34W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Christine Rowe
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Langer
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Haugen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jacie Hurd
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Nancy Koch
28W–31L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Sarah LeDoux
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Marcia Harris
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kathy Burns
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Penelope Prescott
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Kitty Yancey
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.