Teams

X55 8.0 MV Mercuri

2025 NEOTA Mixed 55 & Over · NEOTA 8.0 55&O Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 3.78 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA 8.0 55&O Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Michelle Miluk
published
3.96
Edmond Manuel
published 4
3.90
Curtis Ottens
published 4
3.83
Andrew Albrecht
published 4
3.69
Ken Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Alesia Jones
published 4
3.67
Deanne Gibson
published 4
3.58
Daniel Palermo
published 3.5
3.51
Frank Mercuri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Karen Cipriani
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Pamela Zalba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Michael Falcone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Carole Sanderson
published 3.5
2.93
Elyse Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Timothy Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Gustafson + Ken Gustafson121350% games+0.5% vs expected
Frank Mercuri + Patricia Mercuri7162% games−1.3% vs expected
Deanne Gibson + Curtis Ottens3247% games−4.7% vs expected
Daniel Palermo + Pamela Zalba0638% games−13.6% vs expected
Edmond Manuel + Patricia Mercuri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Miluk
133W–90L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Edmond Manuel
25W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Curtis Ottens
28W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Andrew Albrecht
85W–57L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Ken Gustafson
139W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Alesia Jones
58W–44L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Deanne Gibson
102W–61L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
3.5
Daniel Palermo
43W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Frank Mercuri
109W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Karen Cipriani
86W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pamela Zalba
149W–136L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Michael Falcone
105W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Carole Sanderson
152W–106L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elyse Gustafson
103W–128L career · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Timothy Jones
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.