Teams

V - Sherwood *STARS*

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD · V - Women 3.5 WD

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-01vs V - Rancho Madera Tennis AddictsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGail Spayde / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Nancy Brightwell / Stella Dumlao-Idea2-6, 2-6
2023-11-30vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesLost 01
L#3 DoublesGail Spayde / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Nicole Mitchell / Jean Bridges1-6, 5-7
2023-11-10vs V - WACettesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTeresa Zobrist / Laura Leff vs Susan Cass / Lesley Moverley6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEileen Kakoyiannis / Gail Spayde vs Marilyn Hewitson / Selina Cheng7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-11-08vs V - Malibu RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Oshatz / Teresa Zobrist vs Holly Culhane / Marie Wexler5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-18vs V - North Ranch Wonder WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bishop / Teresa Zobrist vs Tammy Snyder / Mary Carpenter3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-28vs V - Mission Oaks Love HurtsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Oshatz / Teresa Zobrist vs Wendy Brown / Lauren Napoli4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Oshatz / Teresa Zobrist vs Candace Kelly / Kelly Gores6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Oshatz / Teresa Zobrist vs Diane Covington / Cynthia Duncan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Donna Oshatz
published 3.5
3.21
Laura Leff
published
3.17
Michelle Kramar
published
3.13
Christina Privette
published 3.5
2.96
Meghan Finefrock
published
2.95
Teresa Zobrist
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.95
Jennifer Bishop
published
2.94
Lisa Furfine
published
2.90
Eileen Kakoyiannis
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
Renee Christopher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Kakoyiannis + Michelle Kramar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Oshatz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Laura Leff
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Michelle Kramar
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christina Privette
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Meghan Finefrock
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Teresa Zobrist
69W–133L career · 6 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Jennifer Bishop
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
Lisa Furfine
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Eileen Kakoyiannis
116W–91L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Catharine Chambers
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Christopher
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.