Teams

NJ RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-20vs RCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Kiker / Drew Theuerkauf vs Anne Cadden / Mia Smith6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Villa / Gretchen Boettcher vs Mary White / Tracy Zahner6-4, 6-4
2026-05-13vs TTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Villa / Elizabeth Jones vs Bryce Larson / Grace Helgeson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Kiker / Drew Theuerkauf vs Megan Sellers / Cynthia Davis7-6, 6-3
2026-05-09vs NJ PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesMaggie Gomer / Michelle Brown vs Suzie Herb / Liz Mercado2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Kiker vs Rachel Harpster6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Jones / Meredith Nunnelly vs Jennifer Burns / Mollie Turner2-6, 0-6
2026-05-06vs BRMST YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Nunnelly / Catherine Villa vs Aimee Lee / Marlene Evans6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Kiker / Drew Theuerkauf vs Kathryn Payne / Megan Tracy6-2, 6-1
2026-04-22vs CVTA NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesDrew Theuerkauf / Susan Kiker vs Jo Kim / Kim Huss6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Villa / Meredith Nunnelly vs Laura Seredinski / Susan Despotopulos6-1, 6-0
2026-04-15vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Villa / Meredith Nunnelly vs Erin Buchanan / Sierra Doumont6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Jones / Maggie Gomer vs Sharvari Chougule / Suzanne DeVenny6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Catherine Villa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.48
Susan Kiker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.42
Meredith Nunnelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Drew Theuerkauf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.06
Gretchen Boettcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.88
Maggie Gomer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Drew Theuerkauf + Susan Kiker15361% games+7.7% vs expected
Catherine Villa + Meredith Nunnelly404 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Gomer + Gretchen Boettcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Catherine Villa
26W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.66
Susan Kiker
45W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Meredith Nunnelly
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Drew Theuerkauf
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Gretchen Boettcher
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Maggie Gomer
51W–118L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.