Teams

RCC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-27vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Cadden / Mandy Sutton vs Suzanne DeVenny / Amie Elcan6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Huelsman / Mary White vs Amalia Hurtado / Marica Follett6-0, 6-0
2026-05-20vs NJ REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Cadden / Mia Smith vs Susan Kiker / Drew Theuerkauf4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Hammond vs Elizabeth Jones2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary White / Tracy Zahner vs Catherine Villa / Gretchen Boettcher4-6, 4-6
2026-05-06vs TTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMandy Sutton / Anne Cadden vs Tanya Jones / Ashlee Paulson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hammond vs Bryce Larson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Stuckemeyer / Tracy Zahner vs Grace Helgeson / Megan Sellers1-6, 3-6
2026-04-29vs BRMST YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Little / Liz Else vs Trang Nguyen / Angela Hanes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVictoria Hodges vs Erin Johnson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTracy Zahner / Melissa Hammond vs Taylor Evans / Marlene Evans6-7, 4-6
2026-04-22vs NJ PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesMandy Sutton / Holly Little vs Jennifer Burns / Regina Stewart7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Stuckemeyer vs Liz Mercado4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVictoria Hodges / Heather Huelsman vs Rebekah Anders / Frances Swartwout0-6, 4-6
2026-04-15vs CVTA NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Huelsman / Victoria Hodges vs Heather Schwartz / Kim Huss6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLiz Else vs Laura Seredinski6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMia Smith / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Jennifer Hotka / Jo Kim6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Mary White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Mia Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Anne Cadden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
Mandy Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Victoria Hodges
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Holly Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Liz Else
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.22
Heather Huelsman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Melissa Hammond
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Karen Stuckemeyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.82
Tracy Zahner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Stuckemeyer + Anne Cadden7262% games+9.1% vs expected
Anne Cadden + Mandy Sutton3352% games−7.3% vs expected
Heather Huelsman + Mary White213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Stuckemeyer + Liz Else123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Cadden + Mia Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Sutton + Holly Little213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary White
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Mia Smith
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Anne Cadden
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Victoria Hodges
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Holly Little
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Liz Else
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Heather Huelsman
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Melissa Hammond
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Karen Stuckemeyer
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Tracy Zahner
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.